XCoins
⚔ BETTING LEAGUE ⚔


ChatLog

First Previous 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3980 3981 3982 3983 3984 Next Last

time user name message
Feb 1, 2022 23:34:54

edgewalker69

brain fart
Feb 1, 2022 23:34:50

edgewalker69

western
Feb 1, 2022 23:34:43

edgewalker69

There are indeed factions, greatest of all perhaps the great schism of 1054, where the eastern and eastern popes break ties. sure
Feb 1, 2022 23:33:04

xcomreborn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England
Feb 1, 2022 23:32:58

nosliwreborn

You could define equal differently. I.e., all men are equal in that they deserve basic human necessities, but a slave is a slave and I am big rich man and that's just how it is
Feb 1, 2022 23:32:32

edgewalker69

is what im saying
Feb 1, 2022 23:32:30

edgewalker69

Right this is a progressive thing
Feb 1, 2022 23:32:12

edgewalker69

Therefore, slaves are must be free in accordance with the law, because slaves are men too.
Feb 1, 2022 23:31:16

edgewalker69

My point is 1: if the King Rules by divine right. 2. Then god words must be law. 3. Therefore, it is in the interest of the king to push gods law. 4. By gods law, everyman is equal in the eyes of god. 5. Fast forward 500 years to the USA. Abraham Lincoln is the president of the USA, by right of the constitution and the god giving right to pursue happiness.
Feb 1, 2022 23:26:55

edgewalker69

I dont know
Feb 1, 2022 23:26:27

nosliwreborn

I'm having trouble trying to track what point edgewalker69 is trying to make
Feb 1, 2022 23:26:17

edgewalker69

so does the king
Feb 1, 2022 23:26:13

edgewalker69

the state
Feb 1, 2022 23:26:12

edgewalker69

The law push progress
Feb 1, 2022 23:25:55

edgewalker69

Like the slaves of the USA in the civil war, the rights of every man to pursue happiness, well slaves are men too
Feb 1, 2022 23:24:55

edgewalker69

Well in religions, law come from god, right? The King rule by divine right, so if god says; your sins are between you and god, and that is enforced by the state in order to legitimize one's own right to rule.
Feb 1, 2022 23:22:02

edgewalker69

They could in Rome
Feb 1, 2022 23:21:45

edgewalker69

But within the family, the father could not kill his own children
Feb 1, 2022 23:21:31

edgewalker69

The king held absolute control over life and death, but only to the extent sanctioned by his nobles and peers, no man is an island and rule alone.
Feb 1, 2022 23:20:21

edgewalker69

What part?
Feb 1, 2022 23:20:19

edgewalker69

Not true?
Feb 1, 2022 23:20:17

edgewalker69

WutFace
Feb 1, 2022 23:19:41

edgewalker69

Well accroding to some, Jesus Christ Kappa
Feb 1, 2022 23:19:31

edgewalker69

Well no, it didnt remain the same, it evolved. In Rome the father held complete control over life and death within the family, and no man could legally tell him otherwise, this is not the case under feudalism, so what changed?
Feb 1, 2022 23:17:52

edgewalker69

Usually such rewards come for military support or coin
Feb 1, 2022 23:15:49

edgewalker69

That is the idealistic version of capitalisim
Feb 1, 2022 23:14:48

edgewalker69

I agree, but under feudalism, the hierarchy of the family remained the same, the social mobility none existent, yet we broke that in the west, right?
Feb 1, 2022 23:11:34

edgewalker69

I am not a Christian, but one must wonder why in the Christian world do we value the individual, and not in say Mongolia?
Feb 1, 2022 23:09:21

nosliwreborn

Good, I had a grilled cheese not long ago, you?
Feb 1, 2022 23:09:05

edgewalker69

I got this from \"Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism\" By Sir. Larry Siedentop, Doctor. of philosophy, this is his analysis, I am telling you.

First Previous 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3980 3981 3982 3983 3984 Next Last